<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Evolution: The Grand Experiment, a Book Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cafewitteveen.wordpress.com/2010/02/02/evolution-the-grand-experiment-a-book-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cafewitteveen.wordpress.com/2010/02/02/evolution-the-grand-experiment-a-book-review/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 02:14:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: en lord</title>
		<link>http://cafewitteveen.wordpress.com/2010/02/02/evolution-the-grand-experiment-a-book-review/#comment-4299</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[en lord]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafewitteveen.wordpress.com/?p=4342#comment-4299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[His claim to a PhD in medicine in puzzling since the usual degree is an MD. An MD takes 3-4 years of undergrad and then 4 years of medical school though some programs do have 6 year programs. The postdoc work is usually another 3-7 years in addition to previous work and MD is usually not seen as a research degree track, unless it is a dual MD/PhD program.

Assuming his PhD is not in something like the history of medicine, he would still need about 6 years to complete a research oriented advanced degree. However, most people post their alma mater in their CV so this chap&#039;s reticence about his training and education is puzzling. 

Incidentally, a degree in medicine is not a particularly good fit for someone who is trying to be a palaeontologist or geneticist or whatever he is trying to pass himself off as]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>His claim to a PhD in medicine in puzzling since the usual degree is an MD. An MD takes 3-4 years of undergrad and then 4 years of medical school though some programs do have 6 year programs. The postdoc work is usually another 3-7 years in addition to previous work and MD is usually not seen as a research degree track, unless it is a dual MD/PhD program.</p>
<p>Assuming his PhD is not in something like the history of medicine, he would still need about 6 years to complete a research oriented advanced degree. However, most people post their alma mater in their CV so this chap&#8217;s reticence about his training and education is puzzling. </p>
<p>Incidentally, a degree in medicine is not a particularly good fit for someone who is trying to be a palaeontologist or geneticist or whatever he is trying to pass himself off as</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Petursey</title>
		<link>http://cafewitteveen.wordpress.com/2010/02/02/evolution-the-grand-experiment-a-book-review/#comment-1202</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Petursey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 19:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafewitteveen.wordpress.com/?p=4342#comment-1202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m sorry Jeremy...reading that guys site...the arrogance, smugness and general ignorance is mind-numbingly awful..

I can see why some people don&#039;t debate creationists...the stupid hurts sooooo much. They&#039;re the ultimate ostriches with their heads in the sand screaming &quot;I&#039;m not listening I&#039;m not listening&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry Jeremy&#8230;reading that guys site&#8230;the arrogance, smugness and general ignorance is mind-numbingly awful..</p>
<p>I can see why some people don&#8217;t debate creationists&#8230;the stupid hurts sooooo much. They&#8217;re the ultimate ostriches with their heads in the sand screaming &#8220;I&#8217;m not listening I&#8217;m not listening&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Le Café Witteveen</title>
		<link>http://cafewitteveen.wordpress.com/2010/02/02/evolution-the-grand-experiment-a-book-review/#comment-1199</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Le Café Witteveen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafewitteveen.wordpress.com/?p=4342#comment-1199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Chapter 1 Review Chapter 2 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Chapter 1 Review Chapter 2 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Evolution, the Grand Experiment&#8221; Chapter Three: Darwin&#8217;s False Mechanism for Evolution: Acquired Characteristics; Antiquity–1889 A.D. &#171; Le Café Witteveen</title>
		<link>http://cafewitteveen.wordpress.com/2010/02/02/evolution-the-grand-experiment-a-book-review/#comment-1196</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[&#8220;Evolution, the Grand Experiment&#8221; Chapter Three: Darwin&#8217;s False Mechanism for Evolution: Acquired Characteristics; Antiquity–1889 A.D. &#171; Le Café Witteveen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafewitteveen.wordpress.com/?p=4342#comment-1196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] False Mechanism for Evolution: Acquired Characteristics; Antiquity–1889&#160;A.D.  Introduction Chapter 1 Review Chapter 2 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] False Mechanism for Evolution: Acquired Characteristics; Antiquity–1889&nbsp;A.D.  Introduction Chapter 1 Review Chapter 2 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Evolution, the Grand Experiment&#8221; Chapter 2, Evolution&#8217;s False Start: Spontaneous Generation 322 B.C.-1859 A.D. &#171; Le Café Witteveen</title>
		<link>http://cafewitteveen.wordpress.com/2010/02/02/evolution-the-grand-experiment-a-book-review/#comment-1190</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[&#8220;Evolution, the Grand Experiment&#8221; Chapter 2, Evolution&#8217;s False Start: Spontaneous Generation 322 B.C.-1859 A.D. &#171; Le Café Witteveen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafewitteveen.wordpress.com/?p=4342#comment-1190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] &#8220;Evolution, the Grand Experiment&#8221; Chapter 2, Evolution&#8217;s False Start: Spontaneous Generation 322 B.C.-1859&#160;A.D.  Introduction Chapter 1 Review [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;Evolution, the Grand Experiment&#8221; Chapter 2, Evolution&#8217;s False Start: Spontaneous Generation 322 B.C.-1859&nbsp;A.D.  Introduction Chapter 1 Review [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evolution: The Grand Experiment, a Book Review « Le Café Witteveen &#124; Review Gallery</title>
		<link>http://cafewitteveen.wordpress.com/2010/02/02/evolution-the-grand-experiment-a-book-review/#comment-1187</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Evolution: The Grand Experiment, a Book Review « Le Café Witteveen &#124; Review Gallery]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafewitteveen.wordpress.com/?p=4342#comment-1187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] View post: Evolution: &#084;&#104;&#101; &#071;&#114;&#097;&#110;&#100; Experiment, &#097; &#066;&#111;&#111;&#107; ... [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] View post: Evolution: &#84;&#104;&#101; &#71;&#114;&#97;&#110;&#100; Experiment, &#97; &#66;&#111;&#111;&#107; &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Atheism masquerading as science! (Evolution the cult religion) &#124; Cult Following</title>
		<link>http://cafewitteveen.wordpress.com/2010/02/02/evolution-the-grand-experiment-a-book-review/#comment-1182</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Atheism masquerading as science! (Evolution the cult religion) &#124; Cult Following]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 02:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafewitteveen.wordpress.com/?p=4342#comment-1182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Evolution: The Grand Experiment, a Book Review « Le Café Witteveen    Share and Enjoy: [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Evolution: The Grand Experiment, a Book Review « Le Café Witteveen    Share and Enjoy: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://cafewitteveen.wordpress.com/2010/02/02/evolution-the-grand-experiment-a-book-review/#comment-1181</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 01:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafewitteveen.wordpress.com/?p=4342#comment-1181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It appears that this is falling into the same old trap of popular consensus attempting to trump science. 

Scientific consensus is arrived at through careful observation, experimentation, and the ability to falsify claims.

Popular consensus is arrived at through what can only be roughly described as propoganda. It&#039;s through the use of emotion, deception, and repitition that popular consenus is formed.

Popular consensus cannot EVER be allowed to dictate acceptable scientific truth or else we will be quickly headed back to either the dark ages or a very Orwellian nightmarish civilization.

You have my admiration for following through with your commitment. I don&#039;t know if I could personally stomach the continuous bombardment of non-science and dogmatic propoganda.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appears that this is falling into the same old trap of popular consensus attempting to trump science. </p>
<p>Scientific consensus is arrived at through careful observation, experimentation, and the ability to falsify claims.</p>
<p>Popular consensus is arrived at through what can only be roughly described as propoganda. It&#8217;s through the use of emotion, deception, and repitition that popular consenus is formed.</p>
<p>Popular consensus cannot EVER be allowed to dictate acceptable scientific truth or else we will be quickly headed back to either the dark ages or a very Orwellian nightmarish civilization.</p>
<p>You have my admiration for following through with your commitment. I don&#8217;t know if I could personally stomach the continuous bombardment of non-science and dogmatic propoganda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
