Comments on: If Noah’s ark were built today, modern standards should be met

By: Jeremy

Jeremy — Tue, 21 Aug 2012 18:09:06 +0000

“Pain” family.

By: Jude

Jude — Tue, 21 Aug 2012 17:48:09 +0000

Anybody else spot the Freudian slip?

By: Jeremy

Jeremy — Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:30:34 +0000

Seriously!, are you wasting my time or are you serious?

You don’t see the connection between people who make their money in undeserving ways?

That’s neat that your brain’s wiring is inferior.

Good luck with that.

By: Seriously!

Seriously! — Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:21:49 +0000

I’m sorry I do not see the connection between Noah’s Ark and The Pain Family. Are you sure you deserve to be commenting.

By: Jeremy

Jeremy — Sun, 19 Aug 2012 21:02:18 +0000

What did I write that indicates I am empty?

What would you say if the same thing was said about you bases on what you wrote?

Your last sentence doesn’t make sense.

By: pelicanmooch

pelicanmooch — Sun, 19 Aug 2012 14:18:46 +0000

Your language, your lack of respect for Christians in general and the facts about yourself that you have shared in this article leave me to understand the emptiness in your life. No wonder you don’t believe. I doubt that you believe in anything let alone stories of faith. You deserve compassion and tolerance I suppose, although you don’t demonstrate it.

By: Kilre

Kilre — Wed, 28 Sep 2011 20:57:38 +0000

>>There is very little that is “impossible” about Noah’s flood and the ark he built.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Oh you’re adorable. I actually laughed at loud at how ignorant you are.

>>Why doesn’t incest work today ?

Do you understand gene transfer and population bottlenecks?

>>Animals “returning” to where they started… why – for goodness sake ?

Are you dense? Do you understand anything about adaptation to an environment?

>>Especially the physics of the actual structure as proven by Johan Huibers in the article you referred to.

No, he proved nothing of the sort. From the article:

“Indeed, Mr. Huibers admits he had to make concessions. The ark is built on 25 steel barges drawn together to form a basin. A heavy steel frame keeps it rigid. Asked about this, he replied, “It’s much easier to make a wooden ark.” Yet modern safety requirements made changes necessary.”

Yeah, steel frames are sooo Biblical.

And the size alone still has nothing to do with its intended function to house a large number of animals from all around the world that all had vastly different diets and all had to shit. Good luck fitting that into reality.

You have terrible comprehension. No wonder you think Noah’s story is possible.

By: Jeremy

Jeremy — Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:48:30 +0000

Did you subscribe to comments, “Amdrew”?

I don’t want to waste my time responding if you didn’t man up.

Amdrew, what kind of name is that anyway?

By: Amdrew

Amdrew — Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:29:56 +0000

Well, I’d never write with such appalling grammar, but I can see the points made by the person in the “flaming” post you quote. Where to start… “incest upon incest” … !! My gawsh. Why doesn’t incest work today ? Animals “returning” to where they started… why – for goodness sake ? I won’t tell you what your problems are. But claims about ancient civilizations aren’t in any way supposed to make YOU feel better. That’s very post-modern. It not about you.
I only hope that your readers will check out some evidence for themselves. There is very little that is “impossible” about Noah’s flood and the ark he built. Especially the physics of the actual structure as proven by Johan Huibers in the article you referred to.
The REAL important thing is the promise God made AFTER the flood. check it out; you’re lucky to still be here.
~AS.