Facts, dear friends, are irrelevant

Image via: bentobjects (click image to visit site, really cool!)

Yesterday, my friend Daniel wrote a post about how, now that Vladimir Putin is president of Russia, there are passages of scripture that predict the end of the world will be issued in by a relationship between Russia and Iran.

He wrote, “Knowing this I want to keep my eyes on Christ because biblical prophecy is being fulfilled right at this moment. He is the “ONLY WAY” to the Father in heaven! All our peace and hope is in Christ Jesus!”

He recommended that everyone read Ezekiel 38 and 39 for the facts of the end times. Because in Ezekiel 38 and 39, there’s a word Rosh, which he explained means “Russia.”

Now I’m not Jewish, but I know that the Hebrew word for Rosh means something other than Russia.

I mean, do Jewish people celebrate “Russia Year” at Rosh Hashanah or “Russia Month” at Rosh Chodesh?

I don’t think so.

Rosh means “Head” or chief. When Jewish people celebrate Rosh Hashanah, they are celebrating the head of the year. Or new year.

So I wrote back to Daniel explaining that.

Well, shit got ugly. Daniel’s fiancée Molly jumped into defend him, and she explained that the crux of Daniel’s message was that people should follow Jesus.

And I questioned, quite facetiously, doesn’t the crux of the message lose credence if facts are not used in the entire message?

She told me to go fly a kite.

I told her to read a book and do some research.

Maybe not that succinctly.

I screen cap’d a lot of the conversation, and I’ll put it below the fold for your reading pleasure. The problem is I failed to grab the last bit, which was her response to telling her she needed to learn more about Judaism.

She said something like, “I don’t need to learn more. All I know is Jesus is LORD, and that’s all I need.”

But wouldn’t you know it, the post has been removed.

The delete button has been engaged.

A new, improved post has replaced it. It’s been slightly revised with new information. I’ll put that one down there, too.

I honestly thought this ignorance was going extinct.

Between Charles Worley and people who repeat the writings of Tim LaHaye as if fact, I’m not sure believers care anymore. Can’t more be done on the part of the rest of you to help these fledgling, ignorance-loving, psycho-babblers out?

I’m not impressed.

The stupid … it burns so bright, I gotta wear shades.

Here’s the NEW post after the first one was deleted. 

About these ads

9 Responses to Facts, dear friends, are irrelevant

  1. George W. says:

    Really?
    I interpreted this prophesy entirely differently.
    I thought Gog was the ancient word for “Will Smith”, Magog was the ancient name for “West Philadelphia” and “Rosh” was “Bel-Air”.

    I assumed this prophesy explained the cancellation of a crappy television show from the 1990′s.

    Hard to say which one of us is right……

  2. Jude says:

    I agree that “rosh” means “head” or “chief”, but in the sentence quoted it looks like it means a geographical place (“the prince of Rosh, Meshech, and Tubal”. I’d like to have a look at my Hebrew bible, but it’s at home at the moment…

  3. Jeremy says:

    You’re right. The way I understand it, early translations don’t say “of Rosh”.

    The translation he used incorporates footnotes from the NIV, which don’t show up in the text of that version.

    These are versions of scripture informed by Tim LaHaye’s ransacking of the ideas.

    I could be wrong.

  4. Jude says:

    According to biblegateway.com, both the New King James and the New American Standard translate it as above; but the King James has “the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal”.

    They have an online Hebrew version, too – it looks like it could be translated either way.

  5. Jeremy says:

    Shall I prepare my surrender speech?

  6. Jude says:

    Depends. How important is this guy’s friendship to you? :D

    Unless someone can find another passage equating “rosh” with “Russia”, his post is on very weak ground indeed. Apart from this passage, I’ve never read or heard “rosh” as a place name – and even in this case, it could be translated either way.

  7. Either way, everyone in history thought Christ would crash this party before they passed away… they’re all dead. Praise Allah.

  8. Jude says:

    This just in: I looked it up in my dictionary, and the Hebrew word for “Russia” is spelled with a samekh, not a shin. so there’s no possible way that “rosh” could morph into “Russia”.

  9. Jeremy says:

    Praise Allah indeed.

    I have been friend deleted by the dude above. Love it.

    I guess I should have told him that this post existed, before he deleted me.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 361 other followers

%d bloggers like this: