Since he took the time to clarify what a complete moron I am how I misunderstood Van Til’s argument, you should go see how he demonstrates an understanding of Van Til that will literally blow your socks off.
Your socks will surely hit the opposite wall from where you sit.
If I would have presented the words as if they came out of Justin’s own mouth, he would have still said I misunderstood Van Til. Interesting how the Pullmans continue to prove one thing: imbecility begets more imbecility.
My response stands: “Van Til’s arguments are piss poor and make no case to any non-believer and believers alike.”
By the way, Justin, you were wrong. I liked your review of my review. It was excellent … well, excellent for non-belief anyway.
I can finally find out what gift is appropriate to send for the second major validation of my views.
*** Update ***
I fully expect Justin to kvetch that I didn’t respond to his arguments directly. I’m quite certain he didn’t respond to mine. In this mindset, his review doesn’t warrant that kind of response.
If that’s the best they’ve got over there at the gospel messengers … if that’s the best arguments they have for god … if those are the best arguments against me, the bar is set too low.