One of my biggest hopes for the pandemic was for the general public to recognize science, and how it is able to observe, predict and solve problems. It’s clear that science is all around us, in our pockets, in our environment, in our heating and cooling, in our kitchens, hospitals, planes, trains, automobiles. We are surrounded by scientific advancements.
But the scientific illiteracy created a jungle of confusion regarding the pandemic. And despite all that science has done to help everyone, even the unvaccinated, anti-mask crowd, the politics continue to restrain progress.
There’s a level of complacency among the under-educated that cannot be ignored. But here we are.
After spending the last three weeks or so North Carolina and overhearing views which people wear on their sleeves, it has become more apparent that the resistance to basic science is worse than I imagined.
The below article gave me a glimmer of hope. I must point out, though, that the foundation of my deconstructed beliefs are unconnected to whether or not evolution is true or not. I’ve read/listened to and watched many debates between the two views of evolution vs. creation/intelligent design. Any doubt that creationists cast on any part of the theory of evolution falls flat after further research.
I hold a similar view of evolution as many believers view God: it’s there whether we believe it or not. The problem with this view of God is that apart from a few observations of beauty and complexity that seem to point toward a mysterious guide, it doesn’t make it a truth. It just makes it a pattern. Science takes that pattern and gives it a more sound platform that is able to observe, predict and solve problems with a much higher track record of success than, say, a deity.
The vociferous tendency in North Carolina to attach God to Creation and Humanity is frequent. And it’s difficult at times, and promotes a level of quiet in me to just observe and listen.
Here’s a snip from the article from the University of Michigan:
“Almost twice as many Americans held a college degree in 2018 as in 1988,” said co-author Mark Ackerman, a researcher at Michigan Engineering, the U-M School of Information and Michigan Medicine. “It’s hard to earn a college degree without acquiring at least a little respect for the success of science.”
The researchers analyzed a collection of biennial surveys from the National Science Board, several national surveys funded by units of the National Science Foundations, and a series focused on adult civic literacy funded by NASA. Beginning in 1985, these national samples of U.S. adults were asked to agree or disagree with this statement: “Human beings, as we know them today, developed from earlier species of animals.”
The series of surveys showed that Americans were evenly divided on the question of evolution from 1985 to 2007. According to a 2005 study of the acceptance of evolution in 34 developed nations, led by Miller, only Turkey, at 27%, scored lower than the United States. But over the last decade, until 2019, the percentage of American adults who agreed with this statement increased from 40% to 54%.
The current study consistently identified religious fundamentalism as the strongest factor leading to the rejection of evolution. While their numbers declined slightly in the last decade, approximately 30% of Americans continue to be religious fundamentalists as defined in the study. But even those who scored highest on the scale of religious fundamentalism shifted toward acceptance of evolution, rising from 8% in 1988 to 32% in 2019.
Miller predicted that religious fundamentalism would continue to impede the public acceptance of evolution.
“Such beliefs are not only tenacious but also, increasingly, politicized,” he said, citing a widening gap between Republican and Democratic acceptance of evolution.
As of 2019, 34% of conservative Republicans accepted evolution compared to 83% of liberal Democrats.